Preserving Lives and History Through Fire Safety
The primary goal of passive fire protection is to save lives, but it also plays a crucial role in preserving history. Tragically, countless historically significant buildings have been lost to fire over the centuries. While we can’t change the past, we can protect the future by addressing the fire safety risks we now understand. Modern fire safety leaders emphasize that aesthetics should never come at the expense of safety. However, in previous centuries, architects and engineers prioritized visual appeal over fire safety due to a limited understanding of fire risks.
Older buildings, as a result, present unique challenges in meeting current fire resistance standards. Their original construction often lacked consideration for fire protection, requiring innovative solutions to bring them into compliance without compromising their historical value.
The Origins of Passive Fire Protection
Passive fire protection might seem like a modern concept, but its roots date back to ancient Rome. Following a devastating fire that destroyed nearly half the city, Emperor Nero implemented fire-resistant practices, such as spacing buildings further apart and using non-combustible materials. Despite these early efforts, robust passive fire safety compliance measures have only become widespread within the last 20–30 years, driven by modern building codes.
Addressing Historical Oversights
Fire safety standards have evolved significantly, and what was once considered safe often falls short of today’s regulations. Historically, fire safety focused primarily on active measures such as sprinkler systems, extinguishers, and fire escapes. While these remain essential, passive fire protection has proven equally critical in containing fires and limiting their spread.
Older buildings often fail to account for the transfer of heat, air, and smoke, and retrofitting new services can introduce vulnerabilities. Improper modifications may create weak points where fire can spread. Modern regulations now require only tested and approved passive fire protection solutions for retrofitting. Additionally, warranties often stipulate that these systems be installed by certified professionals.
Common Fire Safety Challenges in Older Buildings
- Exposed Timber and Deteriorating Brickwork
Many older buildings feature exposed timber beams, columns, or other wooden elements that pose a fire hazard if not properly protected. Applying fire-retardant coatings or covering these surfaces with fire-resistant materials is essential. Similarly, older brickwork may have weakened mortar, which can allow fire to penetrate walls. Fireproof mortar has become a critical component in ensuring structural fire safety.
- Flammable Paints
Oil-based paints, common in older buildings, are highly flammable. Over time, these paints can become even more volatile, fuelling fires once ignited. Modern intumescent paints, which expand when exposed to heat, provide a safer alternative. Sandblasting and reapplying fire-resistant coatings can preserve original features while enhancing safety.
- Lack of Compartmentation
Compartmentation—the subdivision of buildings into sealed units to contain fire—was rarely considered in historical designs. Retrofitting compartmentation systems is now vital to limiting fire spread and damage. Passive fire protection providers and engineers can design tailored solutions to address this issue.
- Improperly Retrofitted Penetrations
Older buildings often lack proper penetration seals, leaving openings where services such as plumbing and electrical systems pass through walls or floors. These gaps can compromise the fire resistance of the structure. Retrofitting fire-protected penetrations by certified installers is now a standard requirement to ensure compliance and safety.
- Changing Building Use
Fire compliance requirements vary depending on a building’s purpose—residential, commercial, or industrial. When the use of a building changes, such as converting a commercial space into apartments or upgrading a residential building for industrial purposes, fire safety measures must be re-evaluated to meet new standards. Compartmentation and fire resistance levels must align with updated compliance guidelines.
- Heritage Restrictions
Heritage-listed buildings add complexity to fire safety modifications. Any changes must preserve the architectural integrity of the structure, which may limit the flexibility of fire protection solutions. Passive fire experts can develop customized strategies that balance safety, compliance, and preservation, ensuring heritage projects meet modern standards without compromising their historical value.
Ensuring the Future Safety of Older Buildings
Protecting older buildings from fire requires a balance between preserving historical features and implementing modern fire safety measures. By addressing common challenges such as exposed materials, flammable coatings, and insufficient compartmentation, we can enhance fire resistance and compliance.
The integration of advanced passive fire protection systems, combined with adherence to modern building codes, ensures that older buildings can meet today’s safety standards while retaining their unique character. Through careful planning and collaboration with fire protection experts, we can safeguard these structures for generations to come.
Need help finding the right solution for your next project?
Get in touch with the team at Ceasefire today!
